<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Weblog Tools Collection &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Nacin Explains Post Formats In Detail</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2011/01/27/andrew-nacin-explains-post-formats-in-detail/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2011/01/27/andrew-nacin-explains-post-formats-in-detail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=9594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#8217;m pretty excited about the Post Formats feature slated for WordPress 3.1, developers have been taken aback by the lack of flexibility or customization that can be performed with them. Many developers have been wondering how these post formats can be extended or how they can add some of their own. Although WordPress has always had hooks and filters to customize features added into the core, Post Formats strays from that routine by strongly discouraging straying from the standardized post formats. Andrew Nacin, a WordPress core developer outlines why Post Formats work the way they do. It&#8217;s important to note that Post Formats won&#8217;t be for everyone. With term names and such, we went through great lengths to ensure formats were as portable as possible. The idea behind the feature is this standardization and portability for a segment of bloggers. Many designers of themes used for microblogging wanted this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m pretty excited about the Post Formats feature slated for WordPress 3.1, developers have been taken aback by the lack of flexibility or customization that can be performed with them. Many developers have been wondering how these post formats can be extended or how they can add some of their own. Although WordPress has always had hooks and filters to customize features added into the core, Post Formats strays from that routine by strongly discouraging straying from the standardized post formats. </p>
<p>Andrew Nacin, a WordPress core developer <a href="http://andrewnacin.com/2011/01/27/on-standardized-post-formats">outlines why Post Formats work the way they do</a>. It&#8217;s important to note that Post Formats won&#8217;t be for everyone.</p>
<blockquote><p>With term names and such, we went through great lengths to ensure formats were as portable as possible. The idea behind the feature is this standardization and portability for a segment of bloggers. Many designers of themes used for microblogging wanted this ability to offer structured, well-defined content, beyond what could be done with categories and tags. It’s designed so when you switch to a different theme — a specific kind of theme, at that — your content doesn’t lose its most fundamental context.</p></blockquote>
<p>Staying within the confines of the Post Formats standard will be good for all users but custom implementations will lead to problems when it comes time to switch themes. </p>
<blockquote><p>Ultimately, this feature is an exception of the rule. It’s not like we decided we liked the idea of post formats and then later came across the idea to force them to be standardized. No, the idea we started with — before we had a name for them, even — was the standardization itself. The only new thing this feature brings to the table is the portability enabled through standardization. Without that, the feature is useless.</p></blockquote>
<p>Overall, the why&#8217;s and hows of Post Formats is an interesting read and I&#8217;d love to see more posts like this from the core team when it comes to new features in WordPress. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2011/01/27/andrew-nacin-explains-post-formats-in-detail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Are Your Theme Standards?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/05/18/what-are-your-theme-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/05/18/what-are-your-theme-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress Templates WordPress Skins WordPress Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=5867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a thread within the WPTavern forum, there is an interesting discussion taking place among some prominent theme authors on creating a theme standards system. The initial idea is to create a standards system which would give theme authors a goal to shoot for. However, as the discussion has progressed, it&#8217;s easy to see that this entire idea of rating themes or putting together a set of standards is a complex problem. So after reading through that thread, I thought it would be a good idea to tap into the WordPress community to figure out what is most important to you when it comes to using a theme? Is it price, license, design, usability, functionality, or something else?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a thread within the WPTavern forum, there is <a href="http://www.wptavern.com/forum/themes-templates/480-theme-standards-system.html">an interesting discussion</a> taking place among some prominent theme authors on creating a theme standards system. The initial idea is to create a standards system which would give theme authors a goal to shoot for. However, as the discussion has progressed, it&#8217;s easy to see that this entire idea of rating themes or putting together a set of standards is a complex problem. </p>
<p>So after reading through that thread, I thought it would be a good idea to tap into the WordPress community to figure out what is most important to you when it comes to using a theme? Is it price, license, design, usability, functionality, or something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/05/18/what-are-your-theme-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/standards/feed/ ) in 0.88644 seconds, on Feb 14th, 2012 at 8:27 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 14th, 2012 at 9:27 am UTC -->
