<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Weblog Tools Collection &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Applies to Google Code-in</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/30/wordpress-applies-to-google-code-in/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/30/wordpress-applies-to-google-code-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=8907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WordPress development team has applied to be a part of Google&#8217;s Code-in contest to encourage eager high school and secondary school students to contribute WordPress&#8217; future. The development team is currently compiling a task list and looking for suggestions from the community, which can be left as comments here. Do you plan to be a part of Google&#8217;s Code-in contest, and will you claiming any of the WordPress tasks this year?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> development team <a href="http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/i-submitted-our-application-to-be-a-part/">has applied</a> to be a part of <a href="http://code.google.com/gci">Google&#8217;s Code-in contest</a> to encourage eager high school and secondary school students to contribute WordPress&#8217; future.</p>
<p>The development team is currently compiling <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Google_Code-in_2010">a task list</a> and looking for suggestions from the community, which can be left <a href="http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/i-submitted-our-application-to-be-a-part/">as comments here</a>.</p>
<p>Do you plan to be a part of Google&#8217;s Code-in contest, and will you claiming any of the WordPress tasks this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/30/wordpress-applies-to-google-code-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Finally Updates FeedBurner</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/26/google-finally-updates-feedburner/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/26/google-finally-updates-feedburner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=8889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After over three years since its acquisition, Google has finally launched a major upgrade to FeedBurner with an emphasis on real-time stats. The new interface provides real time stats for clicks, views, and podcast downloads, which means you can start seeing what content is drawing traffic from feed readers, Twitter, and other syndicated sources as it happens. The interface can be accessed by clicking the &#8220;Try out the NEW (beta) version!&#8221; link at the top of your FeedBurner account page.  According to the launch article, &#8220;The best way to see these real time features is to publish a new post and then switch to the &#8216;Last two hours&#8217; view to begin seeing updates.&#8221; At this time, the new interface is primarily for the showcasing the new real-time stats.  All other account actions will still need to be done from the old interface. What&#8217;s your take on the new FeedBurner upgrade? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After over three years since its acquisition, <a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a> has finally launched <a href="http://adsenseforfeeds.blogspot.com/2010/10/your-stats-right-away.html">a major upgrade</a> to <a href="http://feedburner.google.com/">FeedBurner</a> with an emphasis on real-time stats.</p>
<blockquote><p>The new interface provides real time stats for clicks, views, and podcast downloads, which means you can start seeing what content is drawing traffic from feed readers, Twitter, and other syndicated sources as it happens.</p></blockquote>
<p>The interface can be accessed by clicking the &#8220;Try out the NEW (beta) version!&#8221; link at the top of your FeedBurner account page.  According to the launch article, &#8220;The best way to see these real time features is to publish a new post and then switch to the &#8216;Last two hours&#8217; view to begin seeing updates.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this time, the new interface is primarily for the showcasing the new real-time stats.  All other account actions will still need to be done from the old interface.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take on the new FeedBurner upgrade? Is this just what FeedBurner needs to bring life back into the service, a step in the wrong direction, or too little too late?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/10/26/google-finally-updates-feedburner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Living Stories Plugin for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/04/30/google-living-stories-plugin-for-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/04/30/google-living-stories-plugin-for-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Plugin Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=8004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google News Blog: Bringing Living Stories to WordPress: Google is releasing their Living Stories experimental format as a plugin and a theme for WordPress.  Living Stories is an experimental news format from Google. In the form of a plugin, each Living Story would be a WordPress category with the plugin allowing a blogger to add the stories themselves. An example would be nice to see but none is to be found yet. Thanks to a writeup on ReadWriteWeb I would love to see an example blog or screenshots.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/bringing-living-stories-to-wordpress.html">Google News Blog: Bringing Living Stories to WordPress</a>: Google is releasing their Living Stories experimental format as a <a href="http://code.google.com/p/living-stories/wiki/WordpressInstallation">plugin and a theme for WordPress</a>.  Living Stories is an experimental news format from Google. In the form of a plugin, each Living Story would be a WordPress category with the plugin allowing a blogger to add the stories themselves. An example would be nice to see but none is to be found yet. Thanks to a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_brings_living_stories_to_wordpress.php">writeup on ReadWriteWeb </a>I would love to see an example blog or screenshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/04/30/google-living-stories-plugin-for-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google To Help Notify You Of New Updates</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/11/23/google-to-help-notify-you-of-new-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/11/23/google-to-help-notify-you-of-new-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=7237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes yet another way to be notified of new upgrades for WordPress in case you need one. Google has announced that they will be using their processing power to scan the source code of websites to look for the version number of the publishing software they are using and send them a notification through Google Webmaster Tools letting them know that an upgrade is available. In the case of WordPress, the meta tag was moved  to the core of WordPress in 2.5. Therefor, anyone running a version of WordPress from 2.5 and above should have it displayed in their source code unless it was either removed or edited out through an action in the functions.php file such as remove_action(&#8216;wp_head&#8217;, &#8216;wp_generator&#8217;); Also, some plugins have been created that removes the version info as well, typically security related plugins. Speaking of security, the security through obscurity argument regarding the public display [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7238" title="googlelogo" src="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/googlelogo.png" alt="googlelogo" width="127" height="54" />Here comes yet another way to be notified of new upgrades for WordPress in case you need one. Google <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-software-version-notifications-for.html" target="_blank">has announced</a> that they will be using their processing power to scan the source code of websites to look for the version number of the publishing software they are using and send them a notification through Google Webmaster Tools letting them know that an upgrade is available. In the case of WordPress, the <strong></strong> meta tag was moved  to the core of WordPress in 2.5. Therefor, anyone running a version of WordPress from 2.5 and above should have it displayed in their source code unless it was either removed or edited out through an action in the functions.php file such as <strong>remove_action(&#8216;wp_head&#8217;, &#8216;wp_generator&#8217;);</strong> Also, some plugins have been created that removes the version info as well, typically security related plugins.</p>
<p>Speaking of security, the security through obscurity argument regarding the public display of the version number of WordPress in the source code was over once the code for WordPress was available to the public. Matt Mullenweg mentioned this in his post regarding how to keep WordPress secure.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hide the WordPress version, they say, and you’ll be fine. Uh, duh, the worm writers thought of that. Where their 1.0 might have checked for version numbers, 2.0 just tests capabilities, version number be damned.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, I&#8217;m with Google in that including the version number in the source code can do more good than harm. In order to receive these update notifications from Google, you&#8217;ll need to have a <a href="https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" target="_blank">Google Webmaster Tools account</a> with a site attached.</p>
<p>The majority of people in the WordPress community have continuously advised removing this generator from being seen in the source code as a means of security. Will this line of thinking continue, or will we see more people add or leave it in to take advantage of the updates from Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/11/23/google-to-help-notify-you-of-new-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Et Tu Google? Then Fail, Net Safety</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/01/31/et-tu-google-then-fail-net-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/01/31/et-tu-google-then-fail-net-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orkut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=5087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I trust Google. I use GMail as my primary email address and store stuff in my mailbox that is of crucial importance to my existence as a citizen of this modern world. Over the past couple of months, Google&#8217;s Orkut has dealt a deadly blow to that trust that is making me rethink my allegiance towards anything Google. I am the owner of a midly popular community on Orkut with about 25k users. Since I was given the privilege of being a beta tester on Orkut, I had created a community called Calcutta many years ago and that community has since, taken on a life of its own. It is run by moderators who report to me and I log in every so often to perform maintenance and help the moderators out. My existence is not only a mystery to the members of the community, it is also the source [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust Google. I use GMail as my primary email address and store stuff in my mailbox that is of crucial importance to my existence as a citizen of this modern world. Over the past couple of months, Google&#8217;s Orkut has dealt a deadly blow to that trust that is making me rethink my allegiance towards anything Google.</p>
<p>I am the owner of a midly popular community on Orkut with about 25k users. Since I was given the privilege of being a beta tester on Orkut, I had created a community called Calcutta many years ago and that community has since, taken on a life of its own. It is run by moderators who report to me and I log in every so often to perform maintenance and help the moderators out. My existence is not only a mystery to the members of the community, it is also the source of much speculation and conspiracy theories, which was fine and dandy.</p>
<p>The Orkut application itself is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orkut#Security_and_safety">full of holes</a> and though Google seems to respond to major public reports of vulnerabilities, they keep coming back. Support for Orkut from Google is almost non-existent with what appears to be <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/orkut-help?pli=1">zero accountability</a>. If one plows through the Google help sections to try and solicit help, they are either faced with a page not found or convoluted help screens that barely ever actually lead to a form to request support. Pleas for help and more often answered by the &#8220;Orkut hackers&#8221; than by actual Google employees. The Orkut application is so dangerous that people do not click on any links that are not Orkut generated and even then accounts and communities are compromised all the time. Hacking scripts and techniques are easily found via a simple Google search.</p>
<p>Now I am just as selfish of an individual as everyone else. I barely cared about any of these issues until something bad happened to me that I needed help for. I was the target of a <a href="http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Sep/0381.html">phishing attack on Orkut</a> and I fell for it hook line and sinker. My Google login is associated with my Orkut login. As soon as I realized that I had just sent my username and password to a phisher (within a few seconds of me hitting enter), I changed my Google account password. But alas, the damage had already been done.</p>
<p>This is where things get really weird. Apparently, a group of &#8220;hackers&#8221; had taken over my Orkut profile and were making drastic changes to the Calcutta community. Emails, IMs and phone calls started to roll in and I was in full panic. I was immediately concerned that my Google account was still compromised and all my personal stuff in my email would be in jeopardy. I went into damage control mode. I changed all my authentication credentials for everything Google.My Gmail account seemed to be untouched but my Orkut account, which uses the same login credentials (I know that was my own fault), seemed to still be under rogue control.</p>
<p>In spite of changing my passwords multiple times, changing login names, changing email addresses and trying all authentication tricks to fix Orkut, the miscreants still regained control of my profile. Instead of falling for the FUD about viruses and worms on my computer (many well wishers who reported the problem to me suggested that I format my computer because i had a key logger that was sending my password to the hackers, completely untrue), I decided to do some research on the problem. The more I learned, the less confidence I had in Orkut and Google&#8217;s intention and/or ability to fix the problems.</p>
<p>Now the only reason I disclose this issue is because I have not only reported it to Orkut (and received no answer), it appears to be the same an <a href="http://www.net-square.com/advisory/NS-310107-ORKUT.pdf">age old vulerability</a> and one of many similar issues that were purportedly fixed. You can recreate this at home if you please.</p>
<p>The Orkut application stores cookies in such a way that if your cookie is ever recreated by someone else or transmitted to someone else, they can use that cookie to log in to Orkut as you. forever. <em>No matter how you change your credentials</em>, you have no recourse of regaining control. So if you ever get caught in a phishing scam that sends your password to someone else and they recreate your orkut_state cookie, they can login as you forever. I will not go into the technical details but the link above discusses it. If you log into your Orkut account using Firefox, using a cookie editing plugin, look for a cookie called orkut_state and copy the contents. Then log out of Orkut. After logging out, re-add the orkut_state cookie to Firefox with the cookie editing plugin and then visit www.orkut.com You will find yourself logged back in. Now I have tried changing my password, using a different browser, using a different machine from another location and other tricks with the same cookie and I have been granted access in all cases. From my research, it appears that Orkut expires the state cookie after 1 day (other reports talk about a 14 day expiration) but that problem is easily circumvented.</p>
<p>So essentially, I am completely at the mercy of the people that have re-created my orkut_state cookie using my old password that I disclosed on the phishing site. I have tried to contact Orkut help, posted messages in the help groups, emailed and complained to Google, emailed and complained via the Orkut complaint forms and even tried sending messages to places that are not meant to be Orkut related. It has been over two weeks and I have yet to receive a single acknowledgment. Nothing, nada, zip.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind telling you that <em>it is despicable for a company like Google to run an extremely popular application with a complete lack of care for its netizens</em>. While I acknowledge that Orkut is not the most important product that Google offers, I think Google should still stand by their product. I also acknowledge that the fact that I am in this mess is my own fault, but shouldn&#8217;t there be <em>some recourse</em>? Would Facebook or MySpace do the same thing? Are we all under the false hope that someone in these big companies actually cares about the people that use their products? Is the online world doomed to failure in circumstances or are we willing to make a stand only when it affects us?</p>
<p>Who can I contact at Google that can even pretend to help? I am NOT &#8220;negotiating&#8221; with the hackers who have control over my profile, which has also been suggested and immidiately turned down by me. Or is my community a complete loss because I made a mistake and fell for a phishing attack?</p>
<p><strong>I am not sure how I feel about trusting my life&#8217;s contents to Google if this is how Google treats compromises in security.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/01/31/et-tu-google-then-fail-net-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WP.com Shifts Into Turbo</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/07/03/wpcom-shifts-into-turbo/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/07/03/wpcom-shifts-into-turbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wp.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt and company have announced that WordPress.com now officially supports Google Gears. Gears is an extension which works with the browser to enhance web based applications. It&#8217;s known for creating local database and file storage, while running javascript in the background to update that content without slowing down the browser. Gears support in WordPress.com means you will be able to store all images and other web page components of the WordPress administration panel locally which will speed up access to those files while reducing unnecessary web traffic. To enable this feature, click on the TURBO link in the WP.COM dashboard area. This will be located in the upper right portion of the screen. You will need to have the GEARS extension installed before you will be able to take advantage of this new feature. [EDIT] Rundown on Fool&#8217;s Wisdom of Google Gears Privacy concerned raised. Thanks Lloyd!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt and company have announced that <a href="http://en.blog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/gears/" target="_blank">WordPress.com now officially supports</a> <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/gears/" target="_blank">Google Gears</a>.  Gears is an extension which works with the browser to enhance web based applications. It&#8217;s known for creating local database and file storage, while running javascript in the background to update that content without slowing down the browser.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/b2-img/2008/07/turbo.png" rel="thumbnail"><img src="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/b2-img/2008/07/turbo.png" alt="WP.COM Now Has Google Gears Support" title="WP.COM Now Has Google Gears Support" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3704 aligncenter" width="305" height="92" /></a></p>
<p>Gears support in WordPress.com means you will be able to store all images and other web page components of the WordPress administration panel locally which will speed up access to those files while reducing unnecessary web traffic. To enable this feature, click on the <strong>TURBO</strong> link in the WP.COM dashboard area. This will be located in the upper right portion of the screen. You will need to have the GEARS extension installed before you will be able to take advantage of this new feature.</p>
<p>[EDIT] Rundown on <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-gears-offline-privacy/">Fool&#8217;s Wisdom</a> of Google Gears Privacy concerned raised. Thanks Lloyd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/07/03/wpcom-shifts-into-turbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress GSoC2008</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/03/12/wordpress-gsoc2008/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/03/12/wordpress-gsoc2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summerofcode]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/03/12/wordpress-gsoc2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guys and gals at Automattic have published their Google Summer Of Code 2008 Codex Article which highlights various mentors and ideas. For those of you who don&#8217;t know what the Google Summer Of Code Project is all about, here is a brief intro. Google Summer of Code (GSoC) is a program that offers student developers stipends to write code for various open source projects. Google will be working with a several open source, free software, and technology-related groups to identify and fund several projects over a three month period. Historically, the program has brought together over 1,500 students with over 130 open source projects to create millions of lines of code. The program, which kicked off in 2005, is now in its fourth year. If are feeling nostalgic or are interested in learning more about the projects we have worked with in the past, check out the 2006 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys and gals at Automattic have published their <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/GSoC2008" title="http://codex.wordpress.org/GSoC2008" target="_blank">Google Summer Of Code 2008 Codex Article</a> which highlights various mentors and ideas. For those of you who don&#8217;t know what the Google Summer Of Code Project is all about, here is a brief intro.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Google Summer of Code</em> (GSoC) is a program that offers student  developers stipends to write code for various open source  projects. Google will be working with a several open source, free  software, and technology-related groups to identify and fund  several projects over a three month period. Historically, the  program has brought together over 1,500 students with over 130  open source projects to create millions of lines of code. The  program, which kicked off in <a href="http://code.google.com/soc/2005/" target="_blank">2005</a>, is  now in its fourth year. If are feeling nostalgic or are  interested in learning more about the projects we have worked  with in the past, check out the <a href="http://code.google.com/soc/2006/" target="_blank">2006</a> and  <a href="http://code.google.com/soc/2007/" target="_blank">2007</a> program pages.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are some big names on the mentor list such as Matt Mullenweg, Lloyd Budd, Joseph Scott and newly acquired Andy Peatling with Matt taking on the double duty of being the Mentor&#8217;s Mentor. Mentors act as administrators over a particular idea or project that is undertaken by a student.</p>
<p>Some of the ideas that have been proposed for this years GSOC include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Performance</li>
<li>XML-RPC</li>
<li>Web Forums Export/Import Standard and Tools</li>
<li>WordPress Import/Export Tuning</li>
<li>Trac Social Bug Tracking development</li>
<li>Integrated Caching Solutions</li>
<li> XHTML validation framework, which helps ensure that all output of WP (including templates) produces valid HTML</li>
<li> Extending the search system to support more advanced search syntax, relevance, and external APIs like Google or Yahoo&#8217;s.</li>
<li> Batch editing of post and attachment attributes such as categories, tags, author.</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see, there is good range of projects for the aspiring coder to participate in. If you are looking to hone your skills and are looking for a challenge, this is a good way for you to test your knowledge.</p>
<p>If you would like to see what was worked on in the previous GSoC, check out the <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/wordpress-soc-2007/web" title="http://groups.google.com/group/wordpress-soc-2007/web" target="_blank">WordPress SOC 2007 Google Group</a> or the <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/GSoC2007" title="http://codex.wordpress.org/GSoC2007" target="_blank">article within the Codex</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/03/12/wordpress-gsoc2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Roundup 5/23</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/news-roundup-523/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/news-roundup-523/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/news-roundup-523/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since there are a couple of interesting news items, I have consolidated them into one post. The Blogging World is agog over the (confirmed) news that Feedburner is being bought out by Google for 100 million. My congratulations to the Feedburner team and the VCs who thought this was a good investment. However, I have also been reading some disturbing rumors/thoughts that Feedburner might inject Google Ads into feeds. I cannot see Google imposing this on Feedburner users but if they do, they will lose me as a user. I choose to keep my feeds ad free and I will look elsewhere. Google is reported to be cracking down on websites and blogs that have little content and lots of ads (or made for adsense type websites, a form of arbitrage). The NY Post reports that a number of users have been notified of being dropped from the AdSense program. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there are a couple of interesting news items, I have consolidated them into one post.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070523/p74#a070523p74">Blogging World is agog</a> over the (confirmed) news that Feedburner is being bought out by Google for 100 million. My congratulations to the Feedburner team and the VCs who thought this was a good investment. However, I have also been reading some disturbing rumors/thoughts that Feedburner might inject Google Ads into feeds. I cannot see Google imposing this on Feedburner users but if they do, they will lose me as a user. I <em>choose </em>to keep my feeds ad free and I will look elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/05232007/business/ad__subtract_business_holly_m__sanders.htm">Google is reported to be cracking down</a> on websites and blogs that have little content and lots of ads (or <a href="http://www.jensense.com/archives/2007/05/google_adsense_16.html">made for adsense type websites</a>, a form of <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/070521-110658">arbitrage</a>). The NY Post reports that a number of users have been notified of being dropped from the AdSense program. I feel that this policing is just the beginning and Google will only continue to try and keep their search results as clean and useful as possible. I do not think most bloggers have to fear <em>if</em> they have content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/news-roundup-523/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdSense Updates Policies</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/01/18/adsense-updates-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/01/18/adsense-updates-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business of Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/01/18/adsense-updates-policies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AdSense Updates Policies A quick rundown of the most significant changes in the AdSense policies that were released today. There is a re-affirmation of the no-images policy, new limitations on referral products and some changes in the competitive ads that can be displayed along with Google Ads. If you display Google Ads on your blog along with other Ad types, this article, along with the original from JenSense might be worth a quick read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/01/18/adsense-updates-policies-some-publishers-will-need-to-make-changes/">AdSense Updates Policies</a> A quick rundown of the most significant changes in the AdSense  policies that were released today. There is a re-affirmation of the no-images policy, new limitations on referral products and some changes in the competitive ads that can be displayed along with Google Ads. If you display Google Ads on your blog along with other Ad types, this article, along with the original from <a href="http://www.jensense.com/archives/2007/01/google_adsense_14.html">JenSense</a> might be worth a quick read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/01/18/adsense-updates-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdSense and image placement</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/19/adsense-and-image-placement/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/19/adsense-and-image-placement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business of Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images_around_ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image_placement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/19/adsense-and-image-placement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AdSense and image placement We ask that publishers not line up images and ads in a way that suggests a relationship between the images and the ads. If your visitors believe that the images and the ads are directly associated, or that the advertiser is offering the exact item found in the neighboring image, they may click the ad expecting to find something that isn&#8217;t actually being offered. That&#8217;s not a good experience for users or advertisers. This is important for many AdSense publishers. From the examples that have been provided, if you are using a plugin like AdSense Beautifier, you might be violating Google&#8217;s AdSense policies and might want to look into removing the plugin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2006/12/ad-and-image-placement-policy.html">AdSense and image placement</a> <em>We ask that publishers not line up images and ads in a way that suggests a relationship between the images and the ads. If your visitors believe that the images and the ads are directly associated, or that the advertiser is offering the exact item found in the neighboring image, they may click the ad expecting to find something that isn&#8217;t actually being offered. That&#8217;s not a good experience for users or advertisers.</em> This is important for many AdSense publishers. From the examples that have been provided, if you are using a plugin like AdSense Beautifier, you might be violating Google&#8217;s AdSense policies and might want to look into removing the plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/19/adsense-and-image-placement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 Web Technology Trends</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/12/2006-web-technology-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/12/2006-web-technology-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcmanus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web_technology_trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/12/2006-web-technology-trends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2006 Web Technology Trends An essay on web technology trends with some large generalizations, some major points and some minors thoughts from McManus. Whenever I see an article like this, I would also like to see some revenue numbers associated with each entry. Though Google was mentioned quite a few times throughout the article, there was no mention of Google&#8217;s stock prices or its market cap (which I think are very valid). Also, it would be very interesting to create a heat map of this article to see which phrases/names/buzzwords were used the most in describing tech trends in 2006.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2006_web_technology_trends.php">2006 Web Technology Trends</a> An essay on web technology trends with some large generalizations, some major points and some minors thoughts from McManus. Whenever I see an article like this, I would also like to see some revenue numbers associated with each entry. Though Google was mentioned quite a few times throughout the article, there was no mention of Google&#8217;s stock prices or its market cap (which I think are very valid). Also, it would be very interesting to create a heat map of this article to see which phrases/names/buzzwords were used the most in describing tech trends in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/12/12/2006-web-technology-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AJAX Search API</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/08/01/google-ajax-search-api/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/08/01/google-ajax-search-api/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search_api]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/08/01/google-ajax-search-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google AJAX Search API Just like it sounds, add an AJAXified search box within your blog with this experimental Google AJAX search API. You need to sign up to get an API key. I wonder if they will let you integerate AdSense for search with this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/">Google AJAX Search API</a> Just like it sounds, add an AJAXified search box within your blog with this experimental Google AJAX search API. You need to sign up to get an API key. I wonder if they will let you integerate AdSense for search with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/08/01/google-ajax-search-api/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WP plugin: MoreMoney</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/07/03/wp-plugin-moremoney/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/07/03/wp-plugin-moremoney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moremoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress_plugin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/07/03/no-puedo-creer-que-lo-hayan-inventadou2026-%ef%bf%bd-wp-plugin-moremoney-aka-buhonejo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WP plugin: MoreMoney Display ads and a message to visitors from Google. The author also suggests that this plugin could be useful if you only want to display ads from search engine visitors and spare your regular patrons from viewing ads. Much like Landing Sites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nopuedocreer.com/quelohayaninventado/?page_id=211">WP plugin: MoreMoney</a> Display ads and a message to visitors from Google. The author also suggests that this plugin could be useful if you only want to display ads from search engine visitors and spare your regular patrons from viewing ads. Much like <a href="http://theundersigned.net/2006/06/landing-sites-11/">Landing Sites</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/07/03/wp-plugin-moremoney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New referrals for Google Pack and Picasa</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/05/05/new-referrals-for-google-pack-and-picasa/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/05/05/new-referrals-for-google-pack-and-picasa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google_pack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/05/05/new-referrals-for-google-pack-and-picasa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New referrals for Google Pack and Picasa you can now refer your users to Google Pack and Picasa. You&#8217;ll earn up to $2 for each time a user installs Pack and up to $1 for each Picasa install. Google really wants to get into your computer. I have not installed Google Pack (and do not intend to do so) but for those without virus protection, Google does seem to offer a 6 month subscription to Norton Antivirus 2005. Are you installing Google Pack?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2006/05/new-referrals-for-google-pack-and.html">New referrals for Google Pack and Picasa</a> <em>you can now refer your users to Google Pack and Picasa. You&#8217;ll earn up to $2 for each time a user installs Pack and up to $1 for each Picasa install. </em> Google really wants to get into your computer. I have not installed Google Pack (and do not intend to do so) but for those without virus protection, Google does seem to offer a 6 month subscription to Norton Antivirus 2005. Are you installing Google Pack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/05/05/new-referrals-for-google-pack-and-picasa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Related Links</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/04/04/google-related-links-now-out-challenges-yahoos-year-old-yq-links/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/04/04/google-related-links-now-out-challenges-yahoos-year-old-yq-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LinkyLoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Related_links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/04/04/google-related-links-now-out-challenges-yahoos-year-old-yq-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Related Links Much like Yahoo&#8217;s Y! Links, Google has now released their Related Links. At this time there is no revenue associated with Related Links but that cannot be too far off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060404-074457">Google Related Links</a> Much like  Yahoo&#8217;s Y! Links, Google has now released their <a href="http://www.google.com/relatedlinks/">Related Links</a>. At this time there is no revenue associated with Related Links but that cannot be too far off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/04/04/google-related-links-now-out-challenges-yahoos-year-old-yq-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/google/feed/ ) in 1.42330 seconds, on Feb 14th, 2012 at 5:34 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 14th, 2012 at 6:34 pm UTC -->
