<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Weblog Tools Collection &#187; dd32</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/dd32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congrats DD32</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/01/13/congrats-dd32/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/01/13/congrats-dd32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dd32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=7527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those that don&#8217;t know, DD32 or Dion Hulse has been granted core commit access to the WordPress project. Just from an outside looking in view, I think DD32 is more than deserving of this position as his contributions in and outside of the core have helped many. On new commit messages you might start seeing a familiar name, DD32 aka Dion Hulse. He’ll be initially focusing on the areas he’s already contributed a ton to like automatic upgrades and HTTP. He has been a mentor to many and is not scared to jump into any part of the code keeping a positive outlook no matter how far down the rabbit hole he ends up. If we look deeper into Matts post, this will be a trend for 2010. More people will be granted commit access to the core as a recognition of trust. I think this is a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that don&#8217;t know, DD32 or Dion Hulse has been <a href="http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/dd32-whatcha-gonna-do/">granted core commit</a> access to the WordPress project. Just from an outside looking in view, I think DD32 is more than deserving of this position as his contributions in and outside of the core have helped many.</p>
<blockquote><p>On new commit messages you might start seeing a familiar name, DD32 aka Dion Hulse. He’ll be initially focusing on the areas he’s already contributed a ton to like automatic upgrades and HTTP. He has been a mentor to many and is not scared to jump into any part of the code keeping a positive outlook no matter how far down the rabbit hole he ends up.</p></blockquote>
<p>If we look deeper into Matts post, this will be a trend for 2010. More people will be granted commit access to the core as a recognition of trust. I think this is a good thing as long as the number of core committers don&#8217;t get out of hand.</p>
<p>For anyone keeping score:<br />
Non Automattic Employed Core Committers 3<br />
Automattic Employed Core Committers 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/01/13/congrats-dd32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Time For Kubrick To Retire?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/03/30/is-it-time-for-kubrick-to-retire/</link>
		<comments>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/03/30/is-it-time-for-kubrick-to-retire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress Templates WordPress Skins WordPress Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dd32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kubrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=5471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dion Hulse a.k.a. DD32 who is a very active WordPress contributor created a ticket in Trac about eight weeks ago outlining his proposal for a new theme to be based on the current WordPress codebase. It&#8217;s long been known that a majority of themes that are created for WordPress end up using Kubrick as the base theme. In this day in age, that is not such a good idea as this leads to themes that are not easy to customize, little documentation, and possibly ugly code. DD32&#8242;s proposal for a new base theme contains the following suggestions: Uses clean markup Has a basic style included, Which is designed to be replaced. The default style should be able to be used by itself, But it should be in such a way that its simple to be customized Doesn&#8217;t rely upon fixed width styling, or fixed background images Uses limited JavaScript Uses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dion Hulse a.k.a. <strong>DD32</strong> who is a very active WordPress contributor created a <a href="http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/9015" target="_blank">ticket in Trac about eight weeks ago</a> outlining his proposal for a new theme to be based on the current WordPress codebase. It&#8217;s long been known that a majority of themes that are created for WordPress end up using Kubrick as the base theme. In this day in age, that is not such a good idea as this leads to themes that are not easy to customize, little documentation, and possibly ugly code. </p>
<p><b>DD32&#8242;s proposal for a new base theme contains the following suggestions:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Uses clean markup </li>
<li>Has a basic style included, Which is designed to be replaced.
<ul>
<li>The default style should be able to be used by itself, But it should be in such a way that its simple to be customized </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Doesn&#8217;t rely upon fixed width styling, or fixed background images </li>
<li>Uses limited JavaScript </li>
<li>Uses the Theme api correctly
<ul>
<li>comments_option() instead of &#8216;open&#8217; == $post-&gt;comment_status </li>
<li>post_class(), etc. </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Look good even when the user modifies the theme slightly (ie. changes widths or floats an item)
<ul>
<li>I realize it&#8217;s impossible if they&#8217;re changing it, But a simple small change should not break everything, It should be designed with the purpose of looking good whilst having its layout moved around </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>includes custom Widget examples, SIMPLE widget examples
<ul>
<li>Ie. Something with no control, Just a simple &#8220;This little widget Adds this theme-specific functionality, It requires no modification, just does this when inserted&#8221; </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Uses ALL the current functionality WordPress offers </li>
</ul>
<p>The way I see it, if you attack the root of the problem and replace Kubrick with a base theme that contains everything DD32 mentioned, this could do nothing but positive things for the WordPress community. First time theme developers would have an excellent base to start from and learn a thing or two in the process with documentation included within the theme. Of course, with the new Syntax highlighter along with function lookups which are now going to be part of WordPress 2.8 and at some point down the road, <b>POSSIBLY</b> template/theme versioning which would work in much the same way as post revisions, we could see a WordPress in the near future where you can build your theme from within the software itself. </p>
<p>So is Kubrick really being replaced? Right now, it&#8217;s an idea that is on the table. In fact, this years <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/GSoC2009" target="_blank">WordPress Google Of Code projects list Theme Frameworks</a> as a project which possibly would be used as a default theme. So if anyone decides to tackle this issue head on, we could end up seeing Kubrick replaced with a much more modern, useful theme. </p>
<p>Are you ready to see Kubrick retire and be replaced with a theme that matches DD32&#8242;s criteria or do you want to see something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2009/03/30/is-it-time-for-kubrick-to-retire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/tag/dd32/feed/ ) in 0.81275 seconds, on Feb 14th, 2012 at 1:11 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 14th, 2012 at 2:11 pm UTC -->
