<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Plugin Releases for 09/03</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/09/03/wordpress-plugin-releases-for-0903/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/09/03/wordpress-plugin-releases-for-0903/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John@Marland Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/09/03/wordpress-plugin-releases-for-0903/#comment-1236838</link>
		<dc:creator>John@Marland Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=4088#comment-1236838</guid>
		<description>perfect, object-cache is exactly what I've been looking for.  Has anybody tried using it yet?  how much does it actually reduce the CPU load?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perfect, object-cache is exactly what I&#8217;ve been looking for.  Has anybody tried using it yet?  how much does it actually reduce the CPU load?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
