<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ownership Of Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blog</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1240497</link>
		<dc:creator>blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1240497</guid>
		<description>I agree that the blog owner has editorial control as long as the edit does not change original intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the blog owner has editorial control as long as the edit does not change original intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: websinthe</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1238600</link>
		<dc:creator>websinthe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1238600</guid>
		<description>I think that the commenter themselves should own the comment. The Blogger, however, should then be able to use that commentas they see fit so long as that comment is attributed to the author.

The reason I think the blogger should have absolute and perpetual rights to those comments is because it is the original blog post that gives the comment its validity and purpose. 

The comments also become a part of the post. Outside the context of the post comments mean nothing, when they are with the post they become part of that post's meaning. If the blogger cannot keep and display that entire meaning then part of the post is lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the commenter themselves should own the comment. The Blogger, however, should then be able to use that commentas they see fit so long as that comment is attributed to the author.</p>
<p>The reason I think the blogger should have absolute and perpetual rights to those comments is because it is the original blog post that gives the comment its validity and purpose. </p>
<p>The comments also become a part of the post. Outside the context of the post comments mean nothing, when they are with the post they become part of that post&#8217;s meaning. If the blogger cannot keep and display that entire meaning then part of the post is lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miroslav Glavic</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1238244</link>
		<dc:creator>Miroslav Glavic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1238244</guid>
		<description>In my opinion and how I run my sites are as following:

1) You as the writer (typer really), own the comment
2) You give me a non-revokable perpetual license for your comment you just posted so I can do whatever I want with it on MY sites, even on other of my sites outside the site you posted the comment in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion and how I run my sites are as following:</p>
<p>1) You as the writer (typer really), own the comment<br />
2) You give me a non-revokable perpetual license for your comment you just posted so I can do whatever I want with it on MY sites, even on other of my sites outside the site you posted the comment in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheiglagh</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1231929</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheiglagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1231929</guid>
		<description>C'mon, have we become that anal retentive? I mean, gosh... why are we fighting about 'who owns the comment?' Have we become as bad as the entertainment and advertising industries? Actors HAVE TO PAID if you hear their voice, see a part of their face, etc... etc... and models like Giselle Bundchen or Laetitia Casta, anything that pertains to them, from using their name or their face, you have to pay. Has blogging become that already?

Alright, let's use a VERY VERY OLD example. WHO OWNS the Letters of the Editor that are being sent to PRINT periodicals? Does the writer GET PAID if their letters are printed? 

Think about it. This is not about ownership. In the end, it will be ABOUT MONEY. :-( And I thought that WordPress is the last bastion of the true internet grassroots movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, have we become that anal retentive? I mean, gosh&#8230; why are we fighting about &#8216;who owns the comment?&#8217; Have we become as bad as the entertainment and advertising industries? Actors HAVE TO PAID if you hear their voice, see a part of their face, etc&#8230; etc&#8230; and models like Giselle Bundchen or Laetitia Casta, anything that pertains to them, from using their name or their face, you have to pay. Has blogging become that already?</p>
<p>Alright, let&#8217;s use a VERY VERY OLD example. WHO OWNS the Letters of the Editor that are being sent to PRINT periodicals? Does the writer GET PAID if their letters are printed? </p>
<p>Think about it. This is not about ownership. In the end, it will be ABOUT MONEY. <img src='http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> And I thought that WordPress is the last bastion of the true internet grassroots movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Projektet II &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment License Made Easy</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1231592</link>
		<dc:creator>Projektet II &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment License Made Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1231592</guid>
		<description>[...] too long ago, I published a post which dove into the controversial subject of comment ownership and I must say, you guys and gals [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too long ago, I published a post which dove into the controversial subject of comment ownership and I must say, you guys and gals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In a state of thixotropy &#187; After all is said and done&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1231393</link>
		<dc:creator>In a state of thixotropy &#187; After all is said and done&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1231393</guid>
		<description>[...] after reading some rather interesting discussion with regard to the ownership of blog comments, I think I&#8217;m going to go back to a purely WP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after reading some rather interesting discussion with regard to the ownership of blog comments, I think I&#8217;m going to go back to a purely WP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commenting Policy &#187; caitlinomara.com</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1231276</link>
		<dc:creator>Commenting Policy &#187; caitlinomara.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1231276</guid>
		<description>[...] relatively new to the whole arena of blogging, the article by Jeff Chandler @ Weblog Tools Collection made me realize that I don&#8217;t have a commenting policy. Being a small blog, the thought never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relatively new to the whole arena of blogging, the article by Jeff Chandler @ Weblog Tools Collection made me realize that I don&#8217;t have a commenting policy. Being a small blog, the thought never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint Monkey</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1231080</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1231080</guid>
		<description>I agree that the blog owner has editorial control as long as the edit does not change original intention. This is true in publishing, where in most cases, the publisher only has licence to publish the work and the copyright remains with the author. If copyright is to be transferred from the original author to the publisher (or anyone else), the author needs to sign a transfer of ownership (there are different rules for a work-for-hire contact).
As a new media, the web is a little messy but ultimately the same fundamental rules apply in the case of most real world contracts. A TOS / TAC would only have any legal bearing (and I think this is a little shaky anyway) if the, in this case, commenter has had it put in their face and/or ticked a button with the link next to it stating they have read and agree to it, when they signed up for the site or post a comment.
So, anyone who has a TOS / TAC floating around their site without the above, would not have any claim to the comment ownership. Even if they had the above tick box etc, they would still have a big problem claiming ownership.

a couple of interesting issues to look at are the old My Space TOS regarding their ownership of major artists music and Virgin mobile using CC pictures from Flicker without (underage) model releases.

I am not a lawyer .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the blog owner has editorial control as long as the edit does not change original intention. This is true in publishing, where in most cases, the publisher only has licence to publish the work and the copyright remains with the author. If copyright is to be transferred from the original author to the publisher (or anyone else), the author needs to sign a transfer of ownership (there are different rules for a work-for-hire contact).<br />
As a new media, the web is a little messy but ultimately the same fundamental rules apply in the case of most real world contracts. A TOS / TAC would only have any legal bearing (and I think this is a little shaky anyway) if the, in this case, commenter has had it put in their face and/or ticked a button with the link next to it stating they have read and agree to it, when they signed up for the site or post a comment.<br />
So, anyone who has a TOS / TAC floating around their site without the above, would not have any claim to the comment ownership. Even if they had the above tick box etc, they would still have a big problem claiming ownership.</p>
<p>a couple of interesting issues to look at are the old My Space TOS regarding their ownership of major artists music and Virgin mobile using CC pictures from Flicker without (underage) model releases.</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A quem pertece os coment&#225;rios dos blogs? &#124; Victor Franco</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230893</link>
		<dc:creator>A quem pertece os coment&#225;rios dos blogs? &#124; Victor Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230893</guid>
		<description>[...] site Weblog Tools Collection fez um post em que se pergunta de quem &#233; a propriedade dos coment&#225;rios feitos pelos leitores. Me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site Weblog Tools Collection fez um post em que se pergunta de quem &#233; a propriedade dos coment&#225;rios feitos pelos leitores. Me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddY-risatioN™ &#187; Your comments are mine&#8230; not?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230789</link>
		<dc:creator>teddY-risatioN™ &#187; Your comments are mine&#8230; not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230789</guid>
		<description>[...] Tools Collection published an article which shed some light on comment ownership issue. It starts off the discussion by highlighting the issue of third party commenting systems, (for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tools Collection published an article which shed some light on comment ownership issue. It starts off the discussion by highlighting the issue of third party commenting systems, (for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junjie</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230785</link>
		<dc:creator>Junjie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230785</guid>
		<description>While there is less of a legal problem in the USA about comments, in Germany not moderating Your comments can bring You into serious trouble.

Courts (especially local ones, not knowing anything about the internet) have already made decisions that are simply ridiculous. One of the most ridiculous examples include a forum owner, who had to moderate all posts made before they were published. He had to scan every single post if something illegal is posted, like a copyright violation, personal attack, etc.

Generally speaking,
If You publish something in Germany, for example the comments of Your readers, You are the one in charge. If Your reader does something bad, it's the forums / blogs owners fault, because he allowed the reader to do so.

Luckily there are also decisions in favor of website owners, however the situation is so-so. Editing my comments is part of protecting myself from lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there is less of a legal problem in the USA about comments, in Germany not moderating Your comments can bring You into serious trouble.</p>
<p>Courts (especially local ones, not knowing anything about the internet) have already made decisions that are simply ridiculous. One of the most ridiculous examples include a forum owner, who had to moderate all posts made before they were published. He had to scan every single post if something illegal is posted, like a copyright violation, personal attack, etc.</p>
<p>Generally speaking,<br />
If You publish something in Germany, for example the comments of Your readers, You are the one in charge. If Your reader does something bad, it&#8217;s the forums / blogs owners fault, because he allowed the reader to do so.</p>
<p>Luckily there are also decisions in favor of website owners, however the situation is so-so. Editing my comments is part of protecting myself from lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draftbetter</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230772</link>
		<dc:creator>draftbetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230772</guid>
		<description>Being the administrator of my site means that I want to control what is viewable by the public on my site.  I state in my rules that I will filter comments for profanity and, of course, I would never edit the comment to change meaning.  I am commonly being told that I did something wrong when i don't think I did and I want that viewable for discussion.

I haven't had to edit anything yet, but I absolutely will if I have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the administrator of my site means that I want to control what is viewable by the public on my site.  I state in my rules that I will filter comments for profanity and, of course, I would never edit the comment to change meaning.  I am commonly being told that I did something wrong when i don&#8217;t think I did and I want that viewable for discussion.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had to edit anything yet, but I absolutely will if I have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment Policy, Do You Need One? &#62;&#62; PiXELWiT</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230663</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment Policy, Do You Need One? &#62;&#62; PiXELWiT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230663</guid>
		<description>[...] Ownership of Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ownership of Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG!</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230613</link>
		<dc:creator>BG!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230613</guid>
		<description>This is a great debate!

FWIW, my take on this matter is that it's just like books and book authors. When I buy a book, the content may well be the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, but the author can't claim ownership of the book itself, as I've acquired ownership of it.

Similarly, comment authors don’t own comments but do own the content of comments. The words may well belong to the commenter, and I’d be ill-advised to change them without his/her say-so, but he/she parcelled up those words in a comment and sent them to me. What I do with that little parcel is up to me, so long as I don't screw with the content without permission and/or a justifiable reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great debate!</p>
<p>FWIW, my take on this matter is that it&#8217;s just like books and book authors. When I buy a book, the content may well be the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, but the author can&#8217;t claim ownership of the book itself, as I&#8217;ve acquired ownership of it.</p>
<p>Similarly, comment authors don’t own comments but do own the content of comments. The words may well belong to the commenter, and I’d be ill-advised to change them without his/her say-so, but he/she parcelled up those words in a comment and sent them to me. What I do with that little parcel is up to me, so long as I don&#8217;t screw with the content without permission and/or a justifiable reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barter Guru</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230525</link>
		<dc:creator>Barter Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230525</guid>
		<description>So I'm confused, if I put a new post on my blog others can claim it as their own? Would I have to copywrite everything? I don't want to find out too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m confused, if I put a new post on my blog others can claim it as their own? Would I have to copywrite everything? I don&#8217;t want to find out too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullet Points: The Linkspam Edition</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullet Points: The Linkspam Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230512</guid>
		<description>[...] admit to not having read very far into the matter, but when we start questioning who owns blog comments, are we taking this thing TOO far? Or is there a legitimate reason for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] admit to not having read very far into the matter, but when we start questioning who owns blog comments, are we taking this thing TOO far? Or is there a legitimate reason for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment is not free, exactly &#124; Waveflux</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230504</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment is not free, exactly &#124; Waveflux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230504</guid>
		<description>[...] left on blogs? The question of commenters&#8217; rights and related notions of authority is under considerable discussion just now, with some thoughtful viewpoints being offered. The post at Intense Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] left on blogs? The question of commenters&#8217; rights and related notions of authority is under considerable discussion just now, with some thoughtful viewpoints being offered. The post at Intense Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Blog Comments, Moderation, and the Conversation &#124; WebGeek</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230500</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Blog Comments, Moderation, and the Conversation &#124; WebGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230500</guid>
		<description>[...] there was a good conversation going on about who owns blog comments and the ethics of editing them. You might want to check it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was a good conversation going on about who owns blog comments and the ethics of editing them. You might want to check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230496</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230496</guid>
		<description>This is a good discussion. Legally, the comments become property of the blog owner as soon as they are posted. Anything that resides on the web domain belongs to the site owner, and there are both benefits and responsibilities associated with that. For example if someone posts a comment that defames someone else, the comment author wouldn't be sued, it would be the blog owner, so the law is pretty clear there. But there are a lot of other issues to consider to protect the commenters. Also, blog owners deal with a lot of spam and trolls mixed in with the great commenters, so there is some effort involved keeping a clean site that benefits those in the blog owners target audience. If you're interested, I've written a few more of my thoughts on this topic here: &lt;a href="http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/2008/06/thoughts-on-blog-comments-moderation-and-the-conversation.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thoughts on Blog Comments, Moderation, and the Conversation&lt;/a&gt; 

(I debated about posting the link because I'm not a fan of link-droppers, but I feel it's relevant and the post was inspired by this conversation. However feel free to delete if you don't agree.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good discussion. Legally, the comments become property of the blog owner as soon as they are posted. Anything that resides on the web domain belongs to the site owner, and there are both benefits and responsibilities associated with that. For example if someone posts a comment that defames someone else, the comment author wouldn&#8217;t be sued, it would be the blog owner, so the law is pretty clear there. But there are a lot of other issues to consider to protect the commenters. Also, blog owners deal with a lot of spam and trolls mixed in with the great commenters, so there is some effort involved keeping a clean site that benefits those in the blog owners target audience. If you&#8217;re interested, I&#8217;ve written a few more of my thoughts on this topic here: <a href="http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/2008/06/thoughts-on-blog-comments-moderation-and-the-conversation.php">Thoughts on Blog Comments, Moderation, and the Conversation</a> </p>
<p>(I debated about posting the link because I&#8217;m not a fan of link-droppers, but I feel it&#8217;s relevant and the post was inspired by this conversation. However feel free to delete if you don&#8217;t agree.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A quién pertenecen los comentarios en un blog?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/06/14/the-ownership-of-comments/#comment-1230488</link>
		<dc:creator>A quién pertenecen los comentarios en un blog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/?p=3648#comment-1230488</guid>
		<description>[...] idea generalizada es dejar claro cuál es la política respecto a los comentarios. Qué harían ustedes si estuvieran [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea generalizada es dejar claro cuál es la política respecto a los comentarios. Qué harían ustedes si estuvieran [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
