<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati: Rethought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WeblogToolsCollection EspaÃƒÂ±ol &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati Re-Inventado</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160640</link>
		<dc:creator>WeblogToolsCollection EspaÃƒÂ±ol &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati Re-Inventado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160640</guid>
		<description>[...] Si es la primera vez que nos visitas, te puedes suscribir a nuestro feed RSS aqui. Gracias por tu visita! [Entrada traducida. Original] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Si es la primera vez que nos visitas, te puedes suscribir a nuestro feed RSS aqui. Gracias por tu visita! [Entrada traducida. Original] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Technorati Refresh&#160;by&#160;OMG!!! Ponies!!!</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160548</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Technorati Refresh&#160;by&#160;OMG!!! Ponies!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160548</guid>
		<description>[...] click all the way through to Weblog Tools Collection Articles, but there was a good one called Technorati: Rethought yesterday about the Technorati refresh. In a word, it looks like crap. Specifically, it looks like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] click all the way through to Weblog Tools Collection Articles, but there was a good one called Technorati: Rethought yesterday about the Technorati refresh. In a word, it looks like crap. Specifically, it looks like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160535</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160535</guid>
		<description>Of course, I am still trying to understand the new rating system. Anyone have a handle on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I am still trying to understand the new rating system. Anyone have a handle on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 06:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160366</guid>
		<description>I prefer the old look as well. However, this is definitely a wee bit faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the old look as well. However, this is definitely a wee bit faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160354</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 01:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160354</guid>
		<description>Oh my, that was not pretty. I have always liked Technorati, but this will scare people away. I hope that we will see a quick revert to the old look and then wait for a new attempt where things are done differently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, that was not pretty. I have always liked Technorati, but this will scare people away. I hope that we will see a quick revert to the old look and then wait for a new attempt where things are done differently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160346</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160346</guid>
		<description>Oh dear.

The ticker is pretty horrid, various searches keep breaking and the site is up and down more often than Paris Hilton.

+1 for effort -10 for usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear.</p>
<p>The ticker is pretty horrid, various searches keep breaking and the site is up and down more often than Paris Hilton.</p>
<p>+1 for effort -10 for usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160337</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160337</guid>
		<description>What a disaster.

The new theme is way too dark, not so web 2.0 like the last one due to loss of whitespace. MARQUEE in small, unreadable COURIER NEW? What were they thinking? 

There was no real need to redesign, it was fine as it was. Although I welcome the usability improvements, despite it already being very usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a disaster.</p>
<p>The new theme is way too dark, not so web 2.0 like the last one due to loss of whitespace. MARQUEE in small, unreadable COURIER NEW? What were they thinking? </p>
<p>There was no real need to redesign, it was fine as it was. Although I welcome the usability improvements, despite it already being very usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ttancm</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160331</link>
		<dc:creator>ttancm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160331</guid>
		<description>I like the design and don't mind the idea of a ticker, but the current one is unreadable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the design and don&#8217;t mind the idea of a ticker, but the current one is unreadable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160319</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160319</guid>
		<description>i much prefered the last design, this one ok granted its a bit cleaner but it just doesnt feel right for what technorati should be. although i do like the http://s.technorati.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i much prefered the last design, this one ok granted its a bit cleaner but it just doesnt feel right for what technorati should be. although i do like the <a href="http://s.technorati.com">http://s.technorati.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160316</guid>
		<description>It looks awesome. :) I'm glad they made it look better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks awesome. <img src='http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;m glad they made it look better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Whatley</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160315</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Whatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160315</guid>
		<description>Takes a bit of getting used to the new design, but it does look great and very Web2.0, unless of course you take into account that stupid ticker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takes a bit of getting used to the new design, but it does look great and very Web2.0, unless of course you take into account that stupid ticker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160313</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160313</guid>
		<description>I have to agree, that ticker is awful. What's wrong with a nice dynamic tag cloud? Oh, those are passe, too? Well, couldn't they have come up with something novel to reveal the technorati zeitgeist?

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree, that ticker is awful. What&#8217;s wrong with a nice dynamic tag cloud? Oh, those are passe, too? Well, couldn&#8217;t they have come up with something novel to reveal the technorati zeitgeist?</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160311</guid>
		<description>Ack!  Opera doesn't like some of the CSS!

Aside from a few mis-placed images, I think the redesign is pretty good.  Not sure what value the ticker will add, but it's out-of-the-way enough for me to ignore it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack!  Opera doesn&#8217;t like some of the CSS!</p>
<p>Aside from a few mis-placed images, I think the redesign is pretty good.  Not sure what value the ticker will add, but it&#8217;s out-of-the-way enough for me to ignore it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewE</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160307</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160307</guid>
		<description>Like it except for one thing: that annoying 'matrix' style news feeder band at the very top. It's too out of sync with the rest of the design and very distracting. Take that away and they have a winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it except for one thing: that annoying &#8216;matrix&#8217; style news feeder band at the very top. It&#8217;s too out of sync with the rest of the design and very distracting. Take that away and they have a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160306</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160306</guid>
		<description>Adam, clarified MFA: Made for AdSense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, clarified MFA: Made for AdSense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160305</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/05/23/technorati-rethought/#comment-1160305</guid>
		<description>i don't know what MFA means, but seriously - a ticker?  WTF?  for a brand that's consistently been pushing web standards, that's a giant leap backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know what MFA means, but seriously - a ticker?  WTF?  for a brand that&#8217;s consistently been pushing web standards, that&#8217;s a giant leap backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
