<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two or Three Columns?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kindachi</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1244484</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1244484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally prefer a 2 columns blog simply because they look less cluttered and more visual appealing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer a 2 columns blog simply because they look less cluttered and more visual appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How many columns make the best blog?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1159945</link>
		<dc:creator>How many columns make the best blog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1159945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mark at Weblog Tools Collection wrote, &#8220;I personally prefer one column themes with a minimal second column. Most information that is put on my sidebar(s) is extraneous and could be placed elsewhere. I have also found that some of that information deters from the original content of the blog.&#8221; Like Lorelle&#8217;s readers, Mark&#8217;s have some valuable input as well. Read their comments on choosing the right blog layout. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-left:4em; padding-left:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.75em;<br />
background-color: #FAE8D3; background: #FAE8D3 url(http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-content/themes/ndesign/images/author.gif) right bottom no-repeat;">
<p>[...] Mark at Weblog Tools Collection wrote, &#8220;I personally prefer one column themes with a minimal second column. Most information that is put on my sidebar(s) is extraneous and could be placed elsewhere. I have also found that some of that information deters from the original content of the blog.&#8221; Like Lorelle&#8217;s readers, Mark&#8217;s have some valuable input as well. Read their comments on choosing the right blog layout. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Designer</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1159868</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1159868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main advantage of 3 columns design is that you can put your adsense in a separate column, without interrupting the main navigation column and leave it clean looking and easy to use.

On the other hand, those who use small monitors (below 17&quot;) often don&#039;t get to see the right column, closest to the edge, because the small resolution &quot;swallows&quot; it, so if one wants to comply with 800*600 standard, most 3 columns layouts won&#039;t suit him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main advantage of 3 columns design is that you can put your adsense in a separate column, without interrupting the main navigation column and leave it clean looking and easy to use.</p>
<p>On the other hand, those who use small monitors (below 17&#8243;) often don&#8217;t get to see the right column, closest to the edge, because the small resolution &#8220;swallows&#8221; it, so if one wants to comply with 800*600 standard, most 3 columns layouts won&#8217;t suit him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Combien de colonnes pour votre blog ?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157961</link>
		<dc:creator>Combien de colonnes pour votre blog ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] une des questions qui se pose trÃ¨s rapidement. Combien de colonnes doit avoir mon blog ? Mark de Weblog Tools Collection et Lorelle se sont posÃ©s la question et j&#8217;avoue que, moi-mÃªme, je me la pose depuis un [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-left:4em; padding-left:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.75em;<br />
background-color: #FAE8D3; background: #FAE8D3 url(http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-content/themes/ndesign/images/author.gif) right bottom no-repeat;">
<p>[...] une des questions qui se pose trÃ¨s rapidement. Combien de colonnes doit avoir mon blog ? Mark de Weblog Tools Collection et Lorelle se sont posÃ©s la question et j&#8217;avoue que, moi-mÃªme, je me la pose depuis un [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austen</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157643</link>
		<dc:creator>Austen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what I think:
1 column: Not a big fan of them. I guess that they&#039;re good for &quot;simple&quot; blogs but it just seems a little too thin sometimes.

2 column: the default, very nice. But sometimes (as in the case of my site, netsua.com) it doesn&#039;t accomodate everything

3 column: Only if used responsibly. I don&#039;t like it when the 2 sidebars are next to each other, but when they&#039;re seperated by the main content and paced out with widgets correctly,it can turn your blog into a website and make you have more stuff.

4 column: Yes, they SHOULD be illegal. That&#039;s just too much.

On my blog I just have blog stuff (archives, categories, calendar, rss feeds) on the left sidebar, then the content, and then on the right sidebar I have other stuff (about me, latest posts, twitter, and blogroll)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I think:<br />
1 column: Not a big fan of them. I guess that they&#8217;re good for &#8220;simple&#8221; blogs but it just seems a little too thin sometimes.</p>
<p>2 column: the default, very nice. But sometimes (as in the case of my site, netsua.com) it doesn&#8217;t accomodate everything</p>
<p>3 column: Only if used responsibly. I don&#8217;t like it when the 2 sidebars are next to each other, but when they&#8217;re seperated by the main content and paced out with widgets correctly,it can turn your blog into a website and make you have more stuff.</p>
<p>4 column: Yes, they SHOULD be illegal. That&#8217;s just too much.</p>
<p>On my blog I just have blog stuff (archives, categories, calendar, rss feeds) on the left sidebar, then the content, and then on the right sidebar I have other stuff (about me, latest posts, twitter, and blogroll)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Work In Progress at Lost in Cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157444</link>
		<dc:creator>A Work In Progress at Lost in Cyberspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 23:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] couple of weeks ago there was a discussion over at Weblog Tools Collection looking at whether two or three column&#8217;s was best. Mark had this to say: I personally prefer [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-left:4em; padding-left:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.75em;<br />
background-color: #FAE8D3; background: #FAE8D3 url(http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-content/themes/ndesign/images/author.gif) right bottom no-repeat;">
<p>[...] couple of weeks ago there was a discussion over at Weblog Tools Collection looking at whether two or three column&#8217;s was best. Mark had this to say: I personally prefer [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Design: How Many Columns? &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157438</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Design: How Many Columns? &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Design: How Many&#160;Columns?  Mark from Weblog Tools Collection offers Two or Three Columns?, his perspective on how many columns a blog should have. I personally prefer one column themes with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-left:4em; padding-left:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.75em;<br />
background-color: #FAE8D3; background: #FAE8D3 url(http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-content/themes/ndesign/images/author.gif) right bottom no-repeat;">
<p>[...] Design: How Many&nbsp;Columns?  Mark from Weblog Tools Collection offers Two or Three Columns?, his perspective on how many columns a blog should have. I personally prefer one column themes with [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lelia Katherine Thomas</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157337</link>
		<dc:creator>Lelia Katherine Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1157337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bit late into this, but I wanted to add my two cents.

I really don&#039;t like most three column designs. To users using a theme with three columns, there are two things to consider: functionality and visual appeal. Then there is the balance of the two. 

My current, and previous, design of my website uses two columns. I studied statistical data with my last design and found that a lot of the content I had in my sidebar was not being used. I was a little shocked to see how little category and archive links were being used (try single percentage points for my users!). So not only did my site not have enough legitimate content to justify a three column design, it&#039;s two column design could be cut down a bit, and it was, in my new design this past January.

So I think in deciding what is right for your site, you should not &lt;em&gt;just&lt;/em&gt; consider the visual appeal or what you &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; the functionality of a three column design offers. Far too often I see sites with three columns, and I perhaps use the links in one of the sidebars, but rarely in both, because most of the time it&#039;s just superfluous stuff. (After noticing the lack of category and archive link usage on my own site, I started to notice my own lack of use of such links. It&#039;s funny that the normal design assumes categories and archive lists are a must in one or more sidebars, as I now don&#039;t believe the statistical reasoning can always back that up.)

Then there is an issue of readability. It&#039;s common knowledge that reading a small paperback book, line by line, feels easier on your eyes that reading a large hardback book with the same print size, line by line. This is because your eyes have to scroll farther, left to right. With that in mind, I think the idea that spreading information out horizontally is a bit faulty. It doesn&#039;t make the text any more scannable, if at all. It isn&#039;t about screen size. It&#039;s about user experience. So then if you want to accommodate that issue of scannability, you keep your three columns but don&#039;t make the entire design very wide...which can look a bit awkward, I think many will agree.

I say two columns. And even as resolutions expand more than they already have, or as dual monitor setups gain popularity, whichever comes first, I think we should stick to two, or, at most, three column designs, because that enables people on such setups to multitask (e.g., your site open in one window on the left of the screen, another&#039;s site open in another window on the right of the screen).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit late into this, but I wanted to add my two cents.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like most three column designs. To users using a theme with three columns, there are two things to consider: functionality and visual appeal. Then there is the balance of the two. </p>
<p>My current, and previous, design of my website uses two columns. I studied statistical data with my last design and found that a lot of the content I had in my sidebar was not being used. I was a little shocked to see how little category and archive links were being used (try single percentage points for my users!). So not only did my site not have enough legitimate content to justify a three column design, it&#8217;s two column design could be cut down a bit, and it was, in my new design this past January.</p>
<p>So I think in deciding what is right for your site, you should not <em>just</em> consider the visual appeal or what you <em>think</em> the functionality of a three column design offers. Far too often I see sites with three columns, and I perhaps use the links in one of the sidebars, but rarely in both, because most of the time it&#8217;s just superfluous stuff. (After noticing the lack of category and archive link usage on my own site, I started to notice my own lack of use of such links. It&#8217;s funny that the normal design assumes categories and archive lists are a must in one or more sidebars, as I now don&#8217;t believe the statistical reasoning can always back that up.)</p>
<p>Then there is an issue of readability. It&#8217;s common knowledge that reading a small paperback book, line by line, feels easier on your eyes that reading a large hardback book with the same print size, line by line. This is because your eyes have to scroll farther, left to right. With that in mind, I think the idea that spreading information out horizontally is a bit faulty. It doesn&#8217;t make the text any more scannable, if at all. It isn&#8217;t about screen size. It&#8217;s about user experience. So then if you want to accommodate that issue of scannability, you keep your three columns but don&#8217;t make the entire design very wide&#8230;which can look a bit awkward, I think many will agree.</p>
<p>I say two columns. And even as resolutions expand more than they already have, or as dual monitor setups gain popularity, whichever comes first, I think we should stick to two, or, at most, three column designs, because that enables people on such setups to multitask (e.g., your site open in one window on the left of the screen, another&#8217;s site open in another window on the right of the screen).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl T</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156929</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am torn between 2 and 3 column design.
2 columns are great for a  page that is going to be long by the nature of its content [10 blogs per page is long].
3 columns are great for pages that are short [saves on scrolling]. The problem arises when you try and combine them both and have a intuitive and simple layout that is correct for each type of page.
You also have to take into account what is actually needed for the sidebar. I feel that a Home button [+ extra navigation] is a must along with the catagories featured and who could forget syndication [I am a ratings hore]. Admin links and archives are not as usefull but I keep them for my ease of use.
For now I will stick with 2 column since 90% or my pages are long. I will let the 10% remaining look silly for the time being, until I figure out php well enough for each page to modify itself for its content size.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am torn between 2 and 3 column design.<br />
2 columns are great for a  page that is going to be long by the nature of its content [10 blogs per page is long].<br />
3 columns are great for pages that are short [saves on scrolling]. The problem arises when you try and combine them both and have a intuitive and simple layout that is correct for each type of page.<br />
You also have to take into account what is actually needed for the sidebar. I feel that a Home button [+ extra navigation] is a must along with the catagories featured and who could forget syndication [I am a ratings hore]. Admin links and archives are not as usefull but I keep them for my ease of use.<br />
For now I will stick with 2 column since 90% or my pages are long. I will let the 10% remaining look silly for the time being, until I figure out php well enough for each page to modify itself for its content size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Laden</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156926</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Laden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if it is a fallacy that the more columns, the more clutter.  Obviously one column is less cluttered than one or more, but if you have a number of items that need to be presented, perhaps spreading out horizontally is a way of reducing clutter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it is a fallacy that the more columns, the more clutter.  Obviously one column is less cluttered than one or more, but if you have a number of items that need to be presented, perhaps spreading out horizontally is a way of reducing clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben G.</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156924</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Canton Web: I think you&#039;ve hit on an interesting point, but I do think too that there is a right and a wrong answer here.  The right answer is don&#039;t use two columns if one will suffice, don&#039;t use three if two will suffice, and flat out, never use four ;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Canton Web: I think you&#8217;ve hit on an interesting point, but I do think too that there is a right and a wrong answer here.  The right answer is don&#8217;t use two columns if one will suffice, don&#8217;t use three if two will suffice, and flat out, never use four <img src='http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canton Web</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156895</link>
		<dc:creator>Canton Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no right or wrong answer here.  For blogs we install for clients, we find that each situation is different.  The key thing we design for is to make sure that all of the important functions, links and menu items are &quot;above the fold&quot;, as this is the all-important first impression hat hits your visitor&#039;s eye.  If they don&#039;t find what they are looking for on that first page view, they&#039;ll click away to another site: we need to make sure the attention grabs the eye without overloading it with a cluttered layout.  Making good two- and three-column layouts is an art, and often, I&#039;ve found whitespace to be almost nonexistent on some of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no right or wrong answer here.  For blogs we install for clients, we find that each situation is different.  The key thing we design for is to make sure that all of the important functions, links and menu items are &#8220;above the fold&#8221;, as this is the all-important first impression hat hits your visitor&#8217;s eye.  If they don&#8217;t find what they are looking for on that first page view, they&#8217;ll click away to another site: we need to make sure the attention grabs the eye without overloading it with a cluttered layout.  Making good two- and three-column layouts is an art, and often, I&#8217;ve found whitespace to be almost nonexistent on some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silly rabbit</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156890</link>
		<dc:creator>silly rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why would you submit in tech deals?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would you submit in tech deals?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devolute</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156886</link>
		<dc:creator>devolute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think most 3 col Wordpress blogs are a little bit widget-happy.

Still, people are doing pretty good things with &#039;extras&#039; in the increasingly large footers these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most 3 col WordPress blogs are a little bit widget-happy.</p>
<p>Still, people are doing pretty good things with &#8216;extras&#8217; in the increasingly large footers these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156859</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/#comment-1156859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I only make and use 2-columms themes, I like them uncluttered and easy to read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only make and use 2-columms themes, I like them uncluttered and easy to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/feed/ ) in 0.43525 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 2:55 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 3:55 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/03/21/two-or-three-columns/feed/ ) in 0.00032 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 3:11 pm UTC. -->