<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake Comment Forms Battle Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brendan</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1149908</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1149908</guid>
		<description>Akismet and SK2 both suffer the same fate any 'pattern' based learning spam engine suffers - false positives are inevitable.

Despite the hype - Akismet isn't perfect and quick frankly wading through 200+ spam comments (why they haven't provided a better bulk listing mode, I'll never know) is painful.

I've been pondering using cookies to control comment posting (i.e. no cookie, no comment). That may not be friendly to those who disable all cookies - but it's about the least obtrusive I can think of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akismet and SK2 both suffer the same fate any &#8216;pattern&#8217; based learning spam engine suffers - false positives are inevitable.</p>
<p>Despite the hype - Akismet isn&#8217;t perfect and quick frankly wading through 200+ spam comments (why they haven&#8217;t provided a better bulk listing mode, I&#8217;ll never know) is painful.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been pondering using cookies to control comment posting (i.e. no cookie, no comment). That may not be friendly to those who disable all cookies - but it&#8217;s about the least obtrusive I can think of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148824</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148824</guid>
		<description>I HAVE A SOLUTION TO COMMENT SPAM!  Are you ready?  Here it is...

Disable comments on your blog.  Ok, seriously, I have been thinking about putting up a link to a chat room instead of comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE A SOLUTION TO COMMENT SPAM!  Are you ready?  Here it is&#8230;</p>
<p>Disable comments on your blog.  Ok, seriously, I have been thinking about putting up a link to a chat room instead of comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Lee</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148141</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148141</guid>
		<description>What about accessibility? Putting more than one form and hiding with CSS seems like it would break accessibility. Not everyone uses Firefox to surf the web :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about accessibility? Putting more than one form and hiding with CSS seems like it would break accessibility. Not everyone uses Firefox to surf the web <img src='http://weblogtoolscollection.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argumenti</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148108</link>
		<dc:creator>Argumenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148108</guid>
		<description>You can fix BB false positives by using this patch:
http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/opera-patch-for-bad-behavior/

It really does work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can fix BB false positives by using this patch:<br />
<a href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/opera-patch-for-bad-behavior/">http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/.....-behavior/</a></p>
<p>It really does work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everton</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148050</link>
		<dc:creator>everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148050</guid>
		<description>BB - no comeback for false positives....

Aksimet and SK2 do a good job of weeding out the spam but they take up lots of unnessary space in your database and cPu resource to process - wouldn't it better to just dump confirmed spam?  That's why tips like this are useful - makes it easier to find the false positives then.  On bigger blogs this is impossible to do manually e.g. at one point in dec i was getting 250 spams a min.....

Augsuman's new comment guard plugin has the right approach in my view, although it auto-deletes which I don't like as it will create false positives that can't be fixed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB - no comeback for false positives&#8230;.</p>
<p>Aksimet and SK2 do a good job of weeding out the spam but they take up lots of unnessary space in your database and cPu resource to process - wouldn&#8217;t it better to just dump confirmed spam?  That&#8217;s why tips like this are useful - makes it easier to find the false positives then.  On bigger blogs this is impossible to do manually e.g. at one point in dec i was getting 250 spams a min&#8230;..</p>
<p>Augsuman&#8217;s new comment guard plugin has the right approach in my view, although it auto-deletes which I don&#8217;t like as it will create false positives that can&#8217;t be fixed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148046</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148046</guid>
		<description>I recently installed &lt;a href="http://www.douglaskarr.com/contact-me/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Douglas Kerr's contact form&lt;/a&gt; which is Ryan Duffs, modified to include an anti-spam question. So far it's been 100% effective in blocking spam e-mails through the comment form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently installed <a href="http://www.douglaskarr.com/contact-me/">Douglas Kerr&#8217;s contact form</a> which is Ryan Duffs, modified to include an anti-spam question. So far it&#8217;s been 100% effective in blocking spam e-mails through the comment form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Beckman</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148037</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Beckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148037</guid>
		<description>Walter: At least Akismet lets you weed out your own false positives; Bad Behavior doesn't make that an easy process, in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter: At least Akismet lets you weed out your own false positives; Bad Behavior doesn&#8217;t make that an easy process, in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Jeffries</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148019</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Jeffries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1148019</guid>
		<description>People bother with this stuff because Bad Behavior has too many false positives. I installed it and got hundreds of reader complaints that they couldn't access my blog http://NoNAIS.org so I dumped Bad Behavior after wasting time trying to get it twiddled right. Akismet has issues too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People bother with this stuff because Bad Behavior has too many false positives. I installed it and got hundreds of reader complaints that they couldn&#8217;t access my blog <a href="http://NoNAIS.org">http://NoNAIS.org</a> so I dumped Bad Behavior after wasting time trying to get it twiddled right. Akismet has issues too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moridin</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147754</link>
		<dc:creator>Moridin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147754</guid>
		<description>I am prone to agree. In my opinion, creativity is of uttermost importance when creating plugins and addons, although imagination without knowledge is ignorance waiting to happen. It is about what people need, not what one can create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am prone to agree. In my opinion, creativity is of uttermost importance when creating plugins and addons, although imagination without knowledge is ignorance waiting to happen. It is about what people need, not what one can create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147634</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147634</guid>
		<description>Why do people bother with this stuff? Akismet, Bad Behaviour, done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people bother with this stuff? Akismet, Bad Behaviour, done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2007/02/16/fake-comment-forms-battle-spam/#comment-1147622</guid>
		<description>seems senseless. i also could give them a blank page. or just install bad behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems senseless. i also could give them a blank page. or just install bad behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
