<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#160; An essay for the blogosphere&#160;&#8212;&#160;BlogoSquare</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-1160926</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; An essay for the blogosphere&#160;&#8212;&#160;BlogoSquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-1160926</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Gulden</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-1124412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Gulden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-1124412</guid>
		<description>Sounds Like great advice to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds Like great advice to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblog Tools Collection &#187; Blogging Essay Competition</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-984578</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblog Tools Collection &#187; Blogging Essay Competition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-984578</guid>
		<description>[...] There are approximately ten days left in the Blogging Essay Competition and there have been two entries so far. A lot of people have been very helpful in reviewing these essays and many people have posted helpful comments and suggestions for the authors. However, we are still far shy of the ten entries required to judge the competition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are approximately ten days left in the Blogging Essay Competition and there have been two entries so far. A lot of people have been very helpful in reviewing these essays and many people have posted helpful comments and suggestions for the authors. However, we are still far shy of the ten entries required to judge the competition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-969300</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-969300</guid>
		<description>A brilliant round-up of blogging options, which is quite an achievement given how many options are out there. Most people get horribly confused and put-off by the plethora of choices available to them, and end up - as with most services - going with the ones friends recommend. 

I would agree with previous comments that perhaps you were a little quick in what amounted to a disparagement of Blogger. It is woefully inadequate to the needs of established, serious as it were, bloggers but it is very attractive to the non-technical and the newbie precisely because it offers a limited, less confusing, array of options. There is a place for simple, restricted options - clearly so, for the platform remains hugely popular. 

And, over time, many Blogger users find ways to customise their sites way beyond what's offered 'out of the tin'. For myself, there can only be one option for the foreseeable future - and that's the full version of WordPress.

The Blogger aspect is a fairly small qualm, though. A great essay overall. x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brilliant round-up of blogging options, which is quite an achievement given how many options are out there. Most people get horribly confused and put-off by the plethora of choices available to them, and end up - as with most services - going with the ones friends recommend. </p>
<p>I would agree with previous comments that perhaps you were a little quick in what amounted to a disparagement of Blogger. It is woefully inadequate to the needs of established, serious as it were, bloggers but it is very attractive to the non-technical and the newbie precisely because it offers a limited, less confusing, array of options. There is a place for simple, restricted options - clearly so, for the platform remains hugely popular. </p>
<p>And, over time, many Blogger users find ways to customise their sites way beyond what&#8217;s offered &#8216;out of the tin&#8217;. For myself, there can only be one option for the foreseeable future - and that&#8217;s the full version of WordPress.</p>
<p>The Blogger aspect is a fairly small qualm, though. A great essay overall. x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964792</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964792</guid>
		<description>I think that covers it.  I'm not sure about underused as regarding blogger; I see a large number of Blogger powered sites around (many of which aren't on Blogspot), and some of them are simply exceptionally well designed.

I use it as a CMS on occasions, mostly for sites that I need to give to tech illiterates to keep updated.  Out of preference, I'd use Wordpress, but that's not always an option.  But yes, debugging can be a pain.  OTOH, the preview/cancel edits functionality is in many ways better than WP, and you need have no knowledge of PHP to get it working.

LJ as first blogging software?  Possibly.  Very early, anyway, and still very good for personal stuff.  And 6A did indeed invent TB.  Their only real breakthrough.  Ah well.

I started with LJ, I now use Wordpress.  If I was to start again, I'd likely go with wordpress.com or LJ depending on emphasis, and recommend those new to the idea do the same.  As a CMS, Wordpress has some limitations, but for a basic package, it's fine.  Wordpress.org is my overall fave, as long as you have access to someone who groks FTP.  Which I self taught, so it ain't hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that covers it.  I&#8217;m not sure about underused as regarding blogger; I see a large number of Blogger powered sites around (many of which aren&#8217;t on Blogspot), and some of them are simply exceptionally well designed.</p>
<p>I use it as a CMS on occasions, mostly for sites that I need to give to tech illiterates to keep updated.  Out of preference, I&#8217;d use Wordpress, but that&#8217;s not always an option.  But yes, debugging can be a pain.  OTOH, the preview/cancel edits functionality is in many ways better than WP, and you need have no knowledge of PHP to get it working.</p>
<p>LJ as first blogging software?  Possibly.  Very early, anyway, and still very good for personal stuff.  And 6A did indeed invent TB.  Their only real breakthrough.  Ah well.</p>
<p>I started with LJ, I now use Wordpress.  If I was to start again, I&#8217;d likely go with wordpress.com or LJ depending on emphasis, and recommend those new to the idea do the same.  As a CMS, Wordpress has some limitations, but for a basic package, it&#8217;s fine.  Wordpress.org is my overall fave, as long as you have access to someone who groks <a href="http://FTP">http://FTP</a>.  Which I self taught, so it ain&#8217;t hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanita.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-11-25</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964530</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanita.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-11-25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964530</guid>
		<description>[...] advice for all. (tags: blogging)    Posted on 25.Nov.2006 in Quicklinks &#8226;  Permalink &#8226;  Comments        var blogTool = "WordPress"; var blogURL = "http://journal.amanita.net"; var blogTitle ="Amanita.net"; var postURL = "http://journal.amanita.net/2006/11/25/links-for-2006-11-25/"; var postTitle = "links for 2006-11-25"; var commentAuthorFieldName = "author"; var commentAuthorLoggedIn = false; var commentFormID = "commentform"; var commentTextFieldName = "comment"; var commentButtonName = "submit"; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advice for all. (tags: blogging)    Posted on 25.Nov.2006 in Quicklinks &bull;  Permalink &bull;  Comments        var blogTool = &#8220;WordPress&#8221;; var blogURL = &#8220;http://journal.amanita.net&#8221;; var blogTitle =&#8221;Amanita.net&#8221;; var postURL = &#8220;http://journal.amanita.net/2006/11/25/links-for-2006-11-25/&#8221;; var postTitle = &#8220;links for 2006-11-25&#8243;; var commentAuthorFieldName = &#8220;author&#8221;; var commentAuthorLoggedIn = false; var commentFormID = &#8220;commentform&#8221;; var commentTextFieldName = &#8220;comment&#8221;; var commentButtonName = &#8220;submit&#8221;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964370</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-964370</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, everyone - I'm flattered to see this show up on WTC. A couple of corrections about some mistated info on my part:

* LiveJournal is NOT based on Movable Type - it was around before and bought by SixApart

* SixApart is not the "inventor" of blogging. Although not 100% clear, LiveJournal could arguably take that title.  My misunderstanding probably stems from the concept of trackbacks, which SA did invent (I view as one of the underpinnings of modern blogging)

* I didn't mean to give short shrift to Blogger - you can indeed customize it through the header editor, I just didn't think that was a very effective (and probably entirely underutilized) way to "customize".  I can't imaging trying to debug it. Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, everyone - I&#8217;m flattered to see this show up on WTC. A couple of corrections about some mistated info on my part:</p>
<p>* LiveJournal is NOT based on Movable Type - it was around before and bought by SixApart</p>
<p>* SixApart is not the &#8220;inventor&#8221; of blogging. Although not 100% clear, LiveJournal could arguably take that title.  My misunderstanding probably stems from the concept of trackbacks, which SA did invent (I view as one of the underpinnings of modern blogging)</p>
<p>* I didn&#8217;t mean to give short shrift to Blogger - you can indeed customize it through the header editor, I just didn&#8217;t think that was a very effective (and probably entirely underutilized) way to &#8220;customize&#8221;.  I can&#8217;t imaging trying to debug it. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick McCharles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; what blog software to choose?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-963528</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick McCharles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; what blog software to choose?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-963528</guid>
		<description>[...] Weblog Tools Collection Â» Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weblog Tools Collection Â» Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Websitetology &#187; Want to look at the blogging landscape?</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-963115</link>
		<dc:creator>Websitetology &#187; Want to look at the blogging landscape?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-963115</guid>
		<description>[...] Weblog Tools Collection Â» Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend Probably thanks to MySpaceâ€™s confused contribution to the world, these days even â€œnormalâ€ people have heard of blogging. Blogging allows amateurs to freely publish information and manage sophisticated online, two-way communication with readers around the world.But, blogging isnâ€™t just for geeks and aspiring musicians anymore. Businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and use blogging as a fluid way to gauge and manage customer sentiment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weblog Tools Collection Â» Blogging: The Not-So-New Trend Probably thanks to MySpaceâ€™s confused contribution to the world, these days even â€œnormalâ€ people have heard of blogging. Blogging allows amateurs to freely publish information and manage sophisticated online, two-way communication with readers around the world.But, blogging isnâ€™t just for geeks and aspiring musicians anymore. Businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and use blogging as a fluid way to gauge and manage customer sentiment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-962714</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-962714</guid>
		<description>Overall, an excellent summary, and from what I've experienced, I mostly agree.

Blogger is more flexible than you give it credit for, but only if you're happy to programme html and css yourself, which most won't be.  I learnt a lot using it, but would never go back now.

One amendment needed however: Livejournal (where I started and still use a lot) is NOT powered by MT.  LJ was a separate company for 5 years before 6A bought it, and their Open Source platform is completely different and very distinct, in fact a lot of the architecture, especially memcache, is used by sites such as wikipedia and slashdot, and had been for a long time before 6A got their grubby little paws on it.

As it happens, for a company planning an intranet blogging platform, LJ as an installed system might be a VERY good option, not least because it's free, but also because each post can have completely different security levels.  Absolutely no good, currently, for open to the public use though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, an excellent summary, and from what I&#8217;ve experienced, I mostly agree.</p>
<p>Blogger is more flexible than you give it credit for, but only if you&#8217;re happy to programme html and css yourself, which most won&#8217;t be.  I learnt a lot using it, but would never go back now.</p>
<p>One amendment needed however: Livejournal (where I started and still use a lot) is NOT powered by MT.  LJ was a separate company for 5 years before 6A bought it, and their Open Source platform is completely different and very distinct, in fact a lot of the architecture, especially memcache, is used by sites such as wikipedia and slashdot, and had been for a long time before 6A got their grubby little paws on it.</p>
<p>As it happens, for a company planning an intranet blogging platform, LJ as an installed system might be a VERY good option, not least because it&#8217;s free, but also because each post can have completely different security levels.  Absolutely no good, currently, for open to the public use though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodrow Jarvis "asim" Hill</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-962687</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodrow Jarvis "asim" Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/11/24/blogging-the-not-so-new-trend/#comment-962687</guid>
		<description>A correction: Livejournal is one of the oldest social networking services, and predates even MovableType; the only thing they have in common, programming-wise, is that both were written in Perl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correction: Livejournal is one of the oldest social networking services, and predates even MovableType; the only thing they have in common, programming-wise, is that both were written in Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
