<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers Are So Wrong About Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/</link>
	<description>Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: twotoques</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/#comment-174024</link>
		<dc:creator>twotoques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/#comment-174024</guid>
		<description>Technorati is an interesting name. A word that folks remember, even if they don't know anything about blogs. Makes you wonder what Technorati is about.

What is off putting (shiver) are prhases like "off putting"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati is an interesting name. A word that folks remember, even if they don&#8217;t know anything about blogs. Makes you wonder what Technorati is about.</p>
<p>What is off putting (shiver) are prhases like &#8220;off putting&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Medical Blog Network</title>
		<link>http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/#comment-167602</link>
		<dc:creator>The Medical Blog Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2006/01/15/bloggers-are-so-wrong-about-media/#comment-167602</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Publishing 2.0 Making Us Smile&lt;/strong&gt;

There is a lively discussion about New Media vs. Old Media roles at Publishing 2.0: &#34;Bloggers Are So Wrong About Media&#34;. Why is this so funny? Because the author uses health &#38; wellness arena to make a case that the blogs are not valuable:
Le</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Publishing 2.0 Making Us Smile</strong></p>
<p>There is a lively discussion about New Media vs. Old Media roles at Publishing 2.0: &quot;Bloggers Are So Wrong About Media&quot;. Why is this so funny? Because the author uses health &amp; wellness arena to make a case that the blogs are not valuable:<br />
Le</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
