Comments on: Opinion: Flock Never Stood A Chance

By: Martin

Martin — Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:19:28 +0000

Photos Celebrities Stars When They Little Kids - over 300 photos in this free site: http://www.gwiazdy.max.boo.pl

By: david

david — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 18:16:13 +0000

for me, it’s simply “what’s the point?” it’s really a niche browser, and I’m not sure that too many people are going to be into it. I have firefox, why flock?

By: Artemis

Artemis — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:54:55 +0000

I had no idea what the software was, just followed a link to their site… read the first page and still didn’t know what it was (although I could tell they wanted me to test it). I had to dig around on the site to even find out what it was. If they cannot bother to tell me what it is, why I should test it for them, why it is/will be better than what I currently use within the first paragraph of the main page then I won’t bother with their software.

By: Spontaneous Monotony

Spontaneous Monotony — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:36:30 +0000

Nothing to get excited about… yet

Despite the MSM hype, Flock doesn’t really have any features that are worth abandoning the better-supported, more stable Firefox to obtain. Since Flock is based on the 1.0.x Firefox codebase, it uses an older version of the Gecko rendering engi…

By: Alan

Alan — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:07:19 +0000

You should check out these guys. They have a lot to say about Flock and ‘Web 2.0′ in general, which I agree with in general.

By: Justin

Justin — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:48:49 +0000

Hmmm, I have not used Flock TOO TOO much but I have enjoyed it so far, no complaints. Seems to run fast enough and just zero problems.

By: zoogies

zoogies — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:51:46 +0000

You speak as though Flock is already a failed experiment…did I miss something, or is it?

For me, I couldn’t use Flock because the developer’s version was unbearably slow. The simplest task caused a delay.

By: E-Phunk

E-Phunk — Fri, 04 Nov 2005 00:53:00 +0000

Flock is pretty rough right now — editing a blog is hella janky and awkward. But the underlying idea is sound. And when it’s polished it will be very useful. To be able to edit and update blog posts in a smooth, fast text editor instead of an HTML textarea would be great for me at least. I’d give them a slim but reasonable chance to gain significant popularity.

However, it still isn’t clear how they’re going to make money giving it away for free. I found some vague bla-bla-bla on their website on that topic, but no clear explanation.

By: Kenny

Kenny — Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:42:42 +0000

My thoughts exactly. Well said.