6/21/2005 ↓

Postings of Obscene Photos End Free-Form Editorial Experiment

Author: Mark Ghosh Category: LinkyLoo

Thanks for visiting! We would like to serve you better. Please subscribe to our RSS feed for daily updates. This blog posts regular Wordpress news, updates of themes, plugins, ideas, hacks, quick fixes and everything about blogging, especially about Wordpress. You can also receive updates from this blog via email if you want that method of notification.

Postings of Obscene Photos End Free-Form Editorial Experiment A week or so ago I had linked to the Wiki experiment from LA Times. The experiment is over. Welcome to the world of wiki vandalism.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Visitors who read this post, also read:

    Friends

    Translate

    Translate to German Translate to Spanish Translate to French Translate to Italian Translate to Portuguese Translate to Japanese Translate to Korean Translate to Russian Translate to Chinese

    Latest Videos

    3 Comments | Leave a comment | Comments RSS

    1. I had been waiting for this to happen. I’ve yet to see where Wikis have been misused personally, and it’s been shocking. What an open forum for abuse!

      I think Wikis, as they become more popular, will have to result to a similar setup to that found at such places as Dmoz.org–human verification and profiles. That way they can eradicate the abusers to a large extent. Of course, that takes away some of the beautiful anonymity of the Wiki.

      Spammers can suck sometimes.

      [Reply] Lelia Katherine Thomas (15 comments.) — 06/21/2005 @ 2:50 pm
    2. LA Times closes its experiment “Wikitorial”

      Last week the US newspaper LA Times introduced an experiment called “Wikitorial”. The experiment involved the use of a wiki (much like the Wikipedia project) to give readers the opportunity of editing and improving an editorial on the consequences of…

      TRANSLATOR'S BLOG — 06/21/2005 @ 4:32 pm
    3. Even as I consider starting my own wikis, I’ve always been concerned about the ease of abuse to which they could be subject to. That’s not to say the collaboration of the Wikipedia isn’t a good thing, it’s just a format very open to the sort of abuse we saw here. Even Wikipedia has had its problems. The problems are always in spots which could easily lend itself to argument. Perhaps the idea of a Wiki for editorials and opinion pieces wasn’t the right place to start this experiment, or perhaps it should have been better monitored and moderated.

      [Reply] Elana (2 comments.) — 06/23/2005 @ 8:11 am

    Leave a comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    (required)

    (required, will not be published)


    S2