Comments on: XHTML syndication http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/ Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:40:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: w8in http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-440 w8in Sun, 23 May 2004 18:41:03 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-440 Are you willing to share the source of "what you have so far" ? :smile: I'm looking for a simple solution to show the last 3 thumbnails in the side of my main blog and this would be just that! Are you willing to share the source of “what you have so far” ? :smile:

I’m looking for a simple solution to show the last 3 thumbnails in the side of my main blog and this would be just that!

]]> By: Mark http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-336 Mark Tue, 04 May 2004 13:18:05 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-336 Good point. The new.gif image has been fixed. If there is something else amiss, please feel free to let me know. :) Thanks Good point. The new.gif image has been fixed. If there is something else amiss, please feel free to let me know. :)
Thanks

]]> By: Mark http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-335 Mark Tue, 04 May 2004 13:15:06 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-335 I agree with you in some respects. But, its a tradeoff. In order to keep "ugly crap" from displaying, you have this jamboree of standards, validations and confusion of code which is not helping the task at hand. It is still very difficult to have a good online syndication of sites. In excess of that, non-coders are still limited by the "ugly crap" of the syndication software and by the format that the syndication software decides to put out. So this would give the syndication software lesser control of the layout for the content and would let the owner of the feed determine their own "ugly crap". I agree with you in some respects. But, its a tradeoff. In order to keep “ugly crap” from displaying, you have this jamboree of standards, validations and confusion of code which is not helping the task at hand. It is still very difficult to have a good online syndication of sites.
In excess of that, non-coders are still limited by the “ugly crap” of the syndication software and by the format that the syndication software decides to put out. So this would give the syndication software lesser control of the layout for the content and would let the owner of the feed determine their own “ugly crap”.

]]> By: Ozh http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-334 Ozh Tue, 04 May 2004 11:20:10 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-334 (by the way, moderator, check here : http://wordpress.org/support/11/4881 ) (by the way, moderator, check here : http://wordpress.org/support/11/4881 )

]]> By: Ozh http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-333 Ozh Tue, 04 May 2004 11:06:54 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/05/03/xhtml-syndication/#comment-333 Well, the whole concept of rss syndication is precisely that *you* control how it displays. Syndicating XHTML would expose your site to display ugly crap Well, the whole concept of rss syndication is precisely that *you* control how it displays. Syndicating XHTML would expose your site to display ugly crap

]]>