Comments on: Blog Statistics http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/ Weblog Tools Blogging Tools Blog Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:50:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Eva http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-108433 Eva Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:40:14 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-108433 The link doesn't work. I am using WP, and I love it! The link doesn’t work. I am using WP, and I love it!

]]> By: Mark http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-133 Mark Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:45:55 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-133 I really like the idea of crawling meta tags of the RSS file. The problem with technorati metadata is that it is reapeated too often. I want to follow the robots.txt crawling rules and the repeated access might annoy some people. I will modify the crawler (when I get a chance) so it seeks out the metatags from the wp-commentsrss2.php which is common across all the versions(except 0.7). Most of the people listed on wp-users from the wiki are in the database. It looks like the people that really mess with Wordpress and are involved in some way with the effort, do not remove their tags...LOL I keep seeing the numbers growing, which is a good sign. I really like the idea of crawling meta tags of the RSS file. The problem with technorati metadata is that it is reapeated too often. I want to follow the robots.txt crawling rules and the repeated access might annoy some people. I will modify the crawler (when I get a chance) so it seeks out the metatags from the wp-commentsrss2.php which is common across all the versions(except 0.7).
Most of the people listed on wp-users from the wiki are in the database. It looks like the people that really mess with Wordpress and are involved in some way with the effort, do not remove their tags…LOL I keep seeing the numbers growing, which is a good sign.

]]> By: Matt http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-132 Matt Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:45:41 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-132 BTW the RSS file is a better place to get the WP version than the meta tag. BTW the RSS file is a better place to get the WP version than the meta tag.

]]> By: Matt http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-131 Matt Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:44:07 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-131 You should try using some other heuristics, like the presence of a wp-* linked file like wp-rss2.php, etc. http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/links.html?rank=&url=wordpress.org might be a good place to start crawling from. How about the wpusers page on the wiki? I can give you some referrer stats from wordpress.org if you're interested. You should try using some other heuristics, like the presence of a wp-* linked file like wp-rss2.php, etc.

http://www.technorati.com/cosm.....dpress.org might be a good place to start crawling from. How about the wpusers page on the wiki? I can give you some referrer stats from wordpress.org if you’re interested.

]]> By: Joe Chung http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-3309 Joe Chung Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/02/02/blog-statistics/#comment-3309 Hi, I'm sort of new to WordPress, with less than a month experience I might add. I can honestly say I have NO idea what you guys were talking about :D This post may be wayyyy too old, but how do I know if my site is recognised as WordPress? And the http://dinki.mine.nu/add_wordpress.php link doesn't work. Hi, I’m sort of new to WordPress, with less than a month experience I might add. I can honestly say I have NO idea what you guys were talking about :D

This post may be wayyyy too old, but how do I know if my site is recognised as WordPress? And the http://dinki.mine.nu/add_wordpress.php link doesn’t work.

]]>